Author’s note: The intended audience for this article is the citizens of Raleigh, N.C. and surrounding towns who enjoy visiting sites within the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation system. Updates to the original article are highlighted in red font.

Pullen Park Set to Close For a Year as Carousel Gets New Home

RALEIGH, N.C.– For only the third time in more than 120 years and for the first time since 1973, the gates at Pullen Park will be closed shut and park-goers will have to find somewhere else to ride the carousel and feed the ducks.

From mid-December until Spring 2011, the train’s whistle will be silent, the carousel won’t be turning and North Carolina’s oldest park will remain empty. The closure is due to a park-wide renovation project, a concept that became a reality eight years ago.

Project Timeline:

•    Carousel Task Force and Master Plan Committee develops Master Plan
•    Raleigh City Counsel adopts Master Plan in October 2001
•    Raleigh voters approve Park Bonds Referendum on 2003 ballot

Many staff members from the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation department tout the historic significance of the park as the rationale behind the project.

Park History:

•    1887: Richard Stanhope Pullen donates farm land to the City of Raleigh for park use
•    1888: Pullen hires first park keeper, Wiley A. Howell. Howell and Pullen work together to map out park landscaping details
•    1891: City of Raleigh’s first public swimming pool built inside park, designated for men-only
•    1895: Additional swimming pool built for women
•    1920: Carousel installed
•    1992: Indoor Pullen Aquatic Center opens

The last park-wide renovation occurred in 1973. This was 11 years before Marvin Howell, park manager of Pullen Park, started his job. The critical aspect of the latest renovation will be the work done on the carousel.

“It’s a good time to upgrade,” Howell said. “It is mainly about the preservation of the carousel, to put it in a climate-controlled building.”

The Dentzel Carousel Company built the carousel in 1911; however, it wasn’t installed into Pullen Park until April 1920, when the City of Raleigh purchased it. The historic, 50-foot wide carousel sits 52 animals, 16 stationary and 36 that move up and down, and two chariots on an 18-section platform.

Each of the animals is routinely restored and cared for individually.

“There is a lady out in Chicago who comes down, picks them up and takes them back to her shop to be repainted,” said Richard Costello, program director for the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department.

The method of removing layers of park paint to expose and preserve the carousel’s original paints made its debut on the Pullen Park carousel in 1976, making it possible for 28 of its animals to now display their original colors.

In regards to the project resulting in any concern and opposition from the public for the sake of preserving the park’s historic significance, Howell did not seem concerned.

“I am sure there are people out there not liking what we are doing, but it is the best thing for the carousel,” Howell said.

After our interview, an open house meeting was held at the Pullen Community Center on November 12, 2009 and no voices of opposition were present.

When complete, the new housing for the carousel will look similar to this artist rendering:

(Contributed Photo by the City of Raleigh)

Another popular attraction to the park, the miniature C.P. Huntington Train, which makes several trips around the park throughout the day, is included in the project as well. It is named after Collis Porter Huntington, who was one of the pioneers in the building of the transcontinental railroad line across the United States.

The train is about one-third of the size and nearly an exact replica of the larger, industrial trains used in the late 1800′s by the Central Pacific Railroad company. Although the train is in remarkable shape, the project will make way for a larger tunnel and a new train station.

Historical significance aside, the popularity level of Pullen Park beyond the Raleigh city limits makes the work advantageous in the eyes of the park’s management.

“Pullen is considered a metro-park but we consider it a regional-park. It brings people around and we are well known along the Eastern seaboard,” said Howell.

Many of the people who do live within the confines of the city of Raleigh and surrounding towns keep Pullen Park near the top of the list of places to spend a sunny afternoon.

“Pullen Park is the most [prominent] park in the City of Raleigh’s Parks and Recreation system, in my opinion. Everyone knows about it,” Costello said.

The park will not close quietly, as the upcoming 2009 Holiday Express at Pullen Park will be held December 10–13, which are the final days that the park will stay open before closing. Costello sees the annual event as a nice finale for the park and has been involved with the event since it first began in 2006.

“We started the Holiday Express three years ago, as we wanted to bring something new back to Pullen Park. In my opinion, it is one of the most staple holiday events in the City of Raleigh,” Costello said.

In a little over a year from now, as the Spring flowers are blooming and the gates to Pullen Park reopen once again, the park will have a rejuvenated appearance yet carry the same charm and character as Richard Stanhope Pullen hoped it would more than a century ago.

ATTN: YouTube Privacy
901 Cherry Ave.
San Bruno, CA 94066

To whom it may concern:

By way of introduction, my name is Joshua Kleinstreuer. I am a web journalist and a freelance video production specialist. As a frequent user of YouTube, I recently decided to take a closer look at your Privacy Policy. After reading the details of the policy, I am offended mostly by the disregard for my personal information and protection of my productions. I would like to bring a few specific terms to your attention.

In regards to the use of my personal information, I consider the words “operate, maintain, and improve the features and functionality of YouTube” to be incredibly broad and vague. It seems to me there are no regulations within your policy that would prevent your company from committing an appropriation tort by utilizing my personal information for the benefit of YouTube.com.

I find it disturbing the amount of information that is being tracked via the usage of cookies, web beacons, and log file information. Such practices come across as nothing more than an easy, cost-free method of conducting marketing research.  The videos that I am interested in viewing should be no one’s business but my own and I fail to see the benefit in keeping record of these statistics. The same holds true for sweepstakes and/or contests I might choose to enter. Such activities have no relation to YouTube and therefore should be considered frivolous.

Lastly, I am perturbed by the fact that YouTube does not make any efforts to protect the content produced by the users of the site. I was taken aback when I read that my video productions are subjected to be “redistributed through the internet and other media channels” without my consent. I find this lack of safeguarding by YouTube to be irresponsible, inconsiderate, and a clear case of negligence. This would allow for any individual to upload my content to his/her own personal site, without my knowledge or consent. Have you considered the possible ramifications that could result from this? For starters, it would easily allow for profiteering without any compensation to the original artist. At this very moment, the videos I produced from long, hours of labor and intensive, creative thought could be filling the pockets of your Average Joe.  On a serious note, there is always the possibility of false light that could result from the re-posting of my videos on websites with content or affiliations that a majority of society may find objectionable. With your lack of efforts to prevent such a scenario from occurring, I would find myself in a considerably difficult position to defend myself if it ever became an issue. It would only require one of my productions to appear on one offensive website before my career and reputation are on the line.

In closing, I trust that the privacy team at YouTube will consider these thoughts seriously. As the world of digital technology continues to evolve throughout the new year ahead, the issue of personal privacy will become increasingly important along with it. The concepts that I have brought forth in this letter are not matters of importance solely to me. It is rational to believe that a majority of YouTube users share my viewpoints. Please do all of us a favor and remedy this policy in the best interest of your users and not simply for the benefit of your company.

Regards,
Joshua Kleinstreuer

Advice to MyFacebookSpaceNews Counsel:

In regards to the recent allegations brought forth by Mr. David Simmons, the management of MyFacebookSpaceNews.com can rest assured that the plaintiff will not win his case once it is brought before a judge. There are several holes to his charge which Mr. Simmons and his counsel will be unable to fill, which I will outline in the following paragraphs.

There is no text within the article to support his claim of libel per se, as the writer never convicted Mr. Simmons verbatim by stating that Mr. Simmons was “driving drunk”. There are two mentions of alcohol within the article, neither of which originate from the writer of the article. The first is Sgt. Rocco Rugiero’s statement that “alcohol was a factor”. This line does not pinpoint which driver of the vehicles involved had consumed alcohol. The second is that “the third motorist was arrested on suspicion of drunken driving”. This vague line as well as the use of the word “suspicion” does not make any claim of guilt.

Another important factor to consider is that the court will most likely label Mr. Simmons as a Vortex Public Figure in regards to the lawsuit. It is stated within the article text that Mr. Simmons is the Vice President of his college chapter for Students Against Drunk Driving. Since SADD is a nationally-recognized, charitable, organization, this easily casts him into the public eye. A beneficial precedent court case for the public figure defense will be Time Inc. v. Firestone, 424 U.S. 448 (1976).

For our purposes, the fact that the plaintiff will be considered a public figure is beneficial because it will require Mr. Simmons to prove that the writer of the article committed actual malice. There are no lines within the article which demonstrate a “reckless disregard for the truth” as the writer only relayed the facts of the case and the statements of the witness/police officer. For the actual malice defense, counsel should consider citing New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) as the precedent court case.

I have one more inquiry which could lead to yet another defense on our part. Did a member of your staff write this article or is this content reposted from an outside journalist? The reason I ask is because if it is not original content produced by MyFacebookSpaceNews.com  then you are completely clear of this libel charge. It is clearly stated in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 that “no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider”. There is also a precedent case to back up this defense, as decided by Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003).If you have any other questions, please feel free to contact me. I trust that the management and counsel will feel completely comfortable in defending the reputation of MyFacebookSpaceNews.com and all charges will be dismissed.

Find Out What You Want to Know

  1. Where and when was News 14 Carolina launched?
  2. Can I watch News 14 Carolina on any cable television provider or satellite service?
  3. Does News 14 Carolina only cover local news?
  4. Is all of the news content live?
  5. Are all of the weather forecasts live?
  6. How do I submit a press-release or news tip to News 14 Carolina?

Launch Dates:

  • News 14 Carolina launched in Raleigh and Charlotte on March 22, 2002
  • The channel became available in the Triad/Winston-Salem/High Point areas on September 25, 2006
  • The most recent expansion, to the coastal areas of North Carolina, occurred on August 18, 2008
    Return to Questions

Availability:

  • No! News 14 Carolina is only available to Time Warner Cable subscribers. Any other cable provider or satellite service will not have a channel with local news, weather and sports 24-hours a day.
    Return to Questions

News Coverage:

  • No, News 14 Carolina focuses on the important news happening in your area yet continually covers major news happening across the United States and around the globe.
    Return to Questions

Live News Content:

  • While not all of the news content on News 14 Carolina is live, we are working around the clock to continually update our stories to bring you the most accurate information. We are live for breaking news updates and for any major developments on the stories that are important to you.
    Return to Questions

Live Weather Coverage:

  • Many of our Weather On the One’s forecasts are done live, but not all of them. Our team of 12 meteorologists are monitoring and updating their forecasts 24-hours a day to ensure you receive the most accurate information. In the event of severe weather, News 14 Carolina provides continuos, live weather coverage until everyone in our viewing area is safe from the storm.
    Return to Questions

News and Press Release Submission:

  • To submit news information or a press release to our Triangle newsroom, call: (919) 882-4040. Or E-mail us at: news@news14.com
  • To submit news information or a press release to our Charlotte newsroom, call: (704) 973-5800. Or E-mail us at: assignmentdesk@news14.com
  • To submit news information or a press release to our Triad/High Point newsroom, call: (336) 856-9497. Or E-mail us at: media@news14.com
  • To submit news information or a press release to our Coastal newsroom, call: 1-866-963-9714. Or E-mail us at: newsroom@news14.com
    Return to Questions

Pullen Park Closes For a Year as Carousel Gets New Home

For only the third time in more than 120 years, the gates at Pullen Park will be closed shut and park-goers will have to find somewhere else to ride a carousel and feed the ducks. From mid-December until the Spring of 2011, the train’s whistle will be silent, the carousel won’t be turning and North Carolina’s oldest park won’t be filled with smiling and laughing children as it usually is.

The closure is due to a park-wide renovations project, a plan that has been on the drawing board for quite some time. The concept began eight years ago, when the Raleigh City Council adopted a revised master plan for Pullen Park on October 21, 2001. Two separate groups, the Master Plan Committee and the Carousel Task Force, wrote the master plan. These two organizations outlined goals and priorities for the sixty-six acre park. In 2003, Raleigh voters approved a Park Bonds Referendum on the ballot. The project will include an extensive review of the programs offered by Pullen Park along with amusement-center renovations.

The historic significance of the park is what makes the project worthwhile, as it dates back to March 22, 1887 when Richard Stanhope Pullen donated farm land to the City of Raleigh to be used as a park. His generous gift is how Pullen Park came to be the first public park in the state of North Carolina. In 1888, Pullen hired the first park keeper, Wiley A. Howell. Pullen and Howell worked together to plan out a vision for Pullen Park, mapping out every detail including bridges and picnic areas, as well as the placement of trees and bushes.

The first, significant addition to the park was also the City of Raleigh’s first public swimming pool, built in 1891 and designated to be used only by men. Four years later, the park added a second swimming pool for women to use. Both of these swimming pools are no longer on the park grounds, as the Pullen Aquatic Center served as a fresh and improved replacement upon its completion in 1992.

However during the decades following the original swimming pools, the park continued to see waves of improvements. Park planners added additional rides, ball parks, playgrounds and concession stands. All of these features have made Pullen Park recognized as the fourteenth-oldest amusement park in the world, according to the National Amusement Park Historical Association.

Even though the park is in good shape, extensive renovations are long overdue. Marvin Howell, the current Park Manager of Pullen Park, has worked at Pullen for twenty-five years. The most recent series of park-wide renovations at Pullen occurred before Howell started his job.

“The last renovations were back in 1973, so it’s a good time to upgrade. It is mainly about the preservation of the carousel, to put it in a climate-controlled building,” Howell said.

The world-famous Dentzel Carousel Company built Carousel #106 in 1911, it arrived at Pullen Park on April 1, 1920. The carousel has a diameter of 50 ft. with an 18-section platform. It houses 52 animals and two chariots. Out of those, 16 animals are stationary and the other 36 animals are “galloping” as they move up-and-down. The animal species are made up of:

  • 29 Horses
  • Four Cats
  • Four Ostriches
  • Four Pigs
  • Four Rabbits
  • Two Giraffes
  • One Tiger
  • One Lion
  • One Goat
  • One Mule

Each of the animals are routinely restored and cared for individually.

“There is a lady out in Chicago who comes down, picks them up, and takes them back to her shop to be repainted,” said Richard Costello, program director for the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department.

In 1976, the National Register of Historic Places added the carousel to its list. One year later, the first major renovation on the carousel took place, lasting for five years. It was the first situation involving a carousel in that layers of park paint were removed to expose and preserve the original. The original paint has been preserved and documented on 28 of the animals. That is used to reproduce the original color and design of the animals as closely as possible to how it was nearly 100 years ago.

In regards to the latest renovations resulting in any concern and opposition from the public for the sake of preserving the park’s historic significance, Howell did not seem unsettled at all.

“I am sure there are people out there not liking what we are doing, but it is the best thing for the carousel,” Howell said with a smile.

When complete, the new housing for the carousel will look similar to this artist rendition:

carousel rendition

Contributed Photo by the City of Raleigh

The second most-popular attraction to the park, the miniature C.P. Huntington Train which makes several trips around the park throughout the day, will also be included in the renovations. The train is about one-third of the size and nearly an exact replica of the real trains used in the late 1800′s by the Central Pacific Railroad company. Although the train itself is in remarkable shape, the renovations project will make way for a larger tunnel and a new train station.

While a lot of work and a lot of money will have to go into the project, it is worth the effort and funds. Historical significance aside, the popularity level of Pullen Park makes the renovations advantageous. Costello and Howell describe the prominence of the park on different levels, yet they both have the same consensus.

“Pullen is considered a metro-park but we consider it a regional-park. It brings people around and we are well known along the Eastern seaboard,” said Howell.

Costello still has plenty of praise for the park, but keeps his focus on a local level.

“Pullen Park is the most notoriable park in the City of Raleigh’s Parks and Recreation system, in my opinion. Everyone knows about it,” Costello said.

For all those that do share the enjoyment of Pullen Park, there is the 2009 Holiday Express at Pullen Park to look forward to. The four-day, annual event will be held December 10 through the 13, which are the final days that the park will stay open before closing for the renovations. Costello sees the event as an excellent, last-hurrah for the park, as he has been heavily involved with the event since it first began in 2006.

“We started the Holiday Express three years ago, as we wanted to bring something new back to Pullen Park. In my opinion, it is one of the most staple holiday events in the City of Raleigh,” Costello said.

In a little over a year from now, as the Spring flowers are blooming and the gates to Pullen Park reopen once again, the park will have a rejuvenated appearance but carry the same charm and character as Richard Stanhope Pullen hoped it would more than a century ago.

Vote in Today’s Web Poll Question!:

Do you believe the Pullen Park renovations will diminish the park’s historic charm?

Questions that I asked:

  1. What prompted the decision for the renovations?
  2. How long has the idea for the renovations been in progress?
  3. Who came up with the idea?
  4. Was funding a difficult proposal to get passed?
  5. Has there been any public opposition to the renovations for the sake of the park’s historic significance?
  6. How does Pullen Park measure-up in popularity compared to other parks in the system?

Facts that I checked and verified:

  • All historical facts and history concerning Pullen Park retrieved from the City of Raleigh’s website
  • Further details concerning the carousel itself obtained from the National Carousel Association

Additional Sources I attempted to contact:

  • Cassie Shumacher and Carolyn Couch–Park Planners for the City of Raleigh

Additional Features to “Webify” this story:

  • Add a sidebar with information on the Holiday Express
  • Embed the web poll into the page instead of an external link
  • Incorporate a slide-show and/or video of the construction progress in a before and after state

Tweeting away: In one of our earlier Blackboard Threads I made a parallel between Twitter and radio. So, in light of the Holiday season I thought I would do an experiment and combine the two. One of the most infamous broadcasts of all time seemed especially appropriate. So I kicked back with the Twitter window open, hit play, and this is the result.

Wireless Access Points in Chapel Hill, N.C.

Picture 1

Now that you have a preview, how about some interactivity?

For some Wiki amendments: Check out the place where a month out of every summer of my youth (ages 11-15) was spent!

My first experience with live blogging went much easier than I had anticipated. Furthermore, it was more fun than I expected it to be.

Although I knew it was likely no one was following my blog and reading the posts as they were updated in real-time, the activity still brought me the personal satisfaction of being the only portal of information from Room 214 to the outside world. In hindsight, it was a similar feeling to my radio days from when I controlled the airwaves of WASU 90.5 FM for two hours, once-a-week. The main difference (besides the medium of course) would be the known size of the audience. It is still an interesting parallel to consider.

The hurdles I encountered:

  • Keeping up with the speaker. She was quite a fast talker. Even though she was not flying through the presentation slides, she had a lot to say about each one. I found it difficult at first to keep one eye on the projector screen, one eye on my laptop, one ear tuned into the speaker, and one ear tuned into the fellow audience members. That is a large amount of sensory information to process simultaneously!
  • The time crunch that I felt also made the decision process of what to blog a bit more difficult. As my speaker rattled through the information, I had to decide on the fly if it was worthy of being conveyed to my audience. I appreciated the challenge, recognizing its value for good practice to have, being involved with the digital media industry.
  • I decided to only provide one additional link, the Publish or Perish program, due to the importance of citations involved with Google Scholar. There were not any more relevant links needed. Any more would have taken away from the most important link of them all.

P.S.  For the curious, I escaped getting a parking ticket! I had hung up an old, irrelevant, parking permit from the mirror in the hopes of it looking official enough to pass inspection. A little trick for others to keep in mind…

  • Will Google Books and Google Scholar stay separate in the long-run? Consensus is: No. At the moment Google will not publicly say why they have not merged as of yet.
  • Can tenure committees interrogate citation counts? (Google Scholar might complicate the issue) Answer is that tenure committees know what they are doing and the guidelines set in place along with the array of choices. The formerly sleeping gentleman is awake and spoke up, saying it is outlined with “Here are the journals that count, here are the ones that don’t count!” Consensus is that G.S. will not complicate matters

G.S. should not replace indexes such as ISI, but it is inevitable that some will not survive.

 

Talk is over, off to go collect my parking ticket!!

Q: “Have you had a scholar not find their work on G.S.?”

A: “No, not yet. But Google does not like bad publicity…so they would fix problems like that”

Random but interesting tangent thought from the speaker on the primary users of G.S.: “Who wrote the Twitter program? Some 55 or 60-year-old. [The youth] use the technology but do not write the technology

Not a very talkative group today! No other relevant questions asked so far

We have doubled in people attending the event, now up to 20 including myself! The gentleman diagonally-across from me is nodding off and falling alseep, no exaggeration! I however, find this talk interesting.

  • 76% of all citations in library databases were also in G.S.
  • Library Databases contained only 47% of citations in G.S.

Check G.S. citations by downloading Publish or Perish

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.